Talk:Corky Romano

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Film: American This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Corky Romano received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

Has anyone considered adding this to the list of films considered to be the worst ever? I submit as exhibit A its 5% on rottentomatoes.com. Just as a comparison, Gigli, which is on the list, got a 6%.

When Peter Falk dies, people will call this the movie that killed Columbo. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.15.153.75 (talk) 07:08, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree i think that Corky Romano 2 can still be made. 10 years or a little more till the next sequel is not un heard of. From 1991 to 2003 people had to wait 12 years to go from Terminator 2 to Terminator 3. Its still possible they could make a Corky Romano 2. In the sequel Corky has to infiltrate the CIA like he did the FBI in the first movie and in this movie he has to steal CIA secrets from the CIA like he had to steal the Evidence from the FBI. and then he gets the Information to his brothers some how with lots of comic relief parts in between. its a open debate as to whether or not Corky's father will be replaced or if the death of the actor means the charter is not replaced. my own personal vote is that they get the father's actor replaced because then the movie would be a heck of alot more funny because then you would have another comedian tring to do there best colombo type character. 99.45.130.77 (talk) 04:19, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image:71m.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 04:22, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]