Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AlMichaels1727/Archive

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.


AlMichaels1727

AlMichaels1727 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

24 February 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

[1]  Looks like a duck to me Firestar464 (talk) 10:59, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Oshwah Isn't that  Likely? Firestar464 (talk) 11:21, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for filing here, Firestar464. Yeah, I guess Oshwah means that the technical evidence is—cool word!—posslikely; behaviorally, the odds on a new account finding their way to a a blocked user of two weeks' standing and making that their first and only edit must be a million to one. Thanks both! ——Serial 11:28, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Firestar464 - I consider the technical evidence I have to be higher than just "possible", but lower than "likely", though I am leaning more toward the direction of "likely", if that helps any... :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 11:24, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  Possilikely (a mix between possible and likely). Same country and relative geolocation. Different ranges, but same OS in user agents. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 11:17, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

24 February 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

Requesting CU as both this and the Alibino account were created within the last couple of weeks. Ao quote myself, behaviorally, the odds on a new account finding their way to a blocked user of two weeks' standing [and trolling it]... must be a million to one.. ——Serial 14:53, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. Between 2000-01-01 and 2021-02-25 on en.wikipedia.org User:AlMichaels1727 (talk | contribs) and User:ItzJustLucky (talk | contribs) both made edits to some pages in common. You can see a chronological list of all their edits on the Interaction Timeline or a table view on the Interaction Analyser. Firestar464 (talk) 04:00, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I was patrolling recent changes and was just seeing the recent edit on the blocked users talk page and reading. That's all. ItzJustLucky (userpage) (talk) (fighting) 12:54, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No, you also commented there. Firestar464 (talk) 01:37, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Looks the same person to me. Cabayi (talk) 16:22, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Blocked and tagged. Closing. Cabayi (talk) 16:24, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

14 May 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

See below. --Blablubbs|talk 14:50, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • I think we got all the accounts—I didn't find any that hadn't been blocked or globally locked. 2v5 and Puyomino are  Confirmed to previous AlMichaels1727 socks. Although Bcarter20098922 and WassupFromBritian are theoretically possible, personally I think it's  Unlikely (the underlying IP seems to be quite static, not dynamic, and while Bcarter and Wassup are on the same range, they are not on the same static IP). Because of the lack of behavioral evidence connecting Bcarter20098922 and WassupFromBritian to the other accounts, I would presume for the time being that they are not related. The remaining accounts have no data on enwiki because, as noted, they are not attached here. @Blablubbs: If you want, you can add tags for 2v5 and Puyomino, but other than that, it doesn't seem like any further action is needed here. Mz7 (talk) 06:08, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for the check. Leaving the two unlikely ones alone.  No tags for the others because I get the feeling that AlMichaels1727 would like those. Closing. --Blablubbs|talk 09:12, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

09 December 2021

Suspected sockpuppets


Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Blocked and tagged based on significant technical evidence. Though the previous cases are stale, I can see from the logs that the Lopbunny69 account is editing with the exact IP associated with the AlMichaels1727 accounts. A behavioural check against Alibino shows an obvious overlap. -- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 18:01, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/AlMichaels1727/Archive&oldid=1060054566"