Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/KoreanShoriSenyou

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/KoreanShoriSenyou}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Azukimonaka


Prior accounts
  • Supporting evidence:

Talk:Blade_of_the_Phantom_Master#RfC:_Is_the_work_created_by_manhwa_artistes_manga.3F

Azukimonaka used ocn.ad.jp or ocn.ne.jp ISP and these anons show the same writing pattern of him and same articles (manhwa related articles).[5][6]] Besides, Jazz81089 appeared at the article after his 8 months break and also edited Pyrus pyrifolia[7], all of which articles Azukimonaka vandalised. Even though Azukimonaka is banned, he keeps appearing as anon and vandalised Korean related pages, so it is highly likely he creates more unrevealed sock accounts. --Appletrees (talk) 00:09, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • information Note: There is very little I can tell you here. There are no registered accounts on the IPs, and Jazz has too few edits to be of technical use. crystal ball CheckUser is not a crystal ball. Thatcher 03:06, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

KoreanShoriSenyou

  • Code letter: C, E, G
  • Supporting evidence:

Everything links to everything.




The report just holds part of my research(?) due to the length. I firmly believe this sockpuppetry should not be condoned any furher. The sockpuppet master has transformed himself with several accounts as well as ip anonymous users. Thanks.--Appletrees (talk) 01:40, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Stale - Wildcop (talk · contribs), Z1x2c3 (talk · contribs), NekoNekoTeacher (talk · contribs), ShinjukuXYZ (talk · contribs), Necmate (talk · contribs), Sir Joestar (talk · contribs)
 Deferred - another checkuser due to nature of IPs and ranges - Alison 12:46, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above clerk said to me this file is a valid request. Some of them are confirmed as "socks". This is a "constructive" and "valid" request to resolve problems in this community to prevent some people's "suspicious and "desruptive behaviors" including 3RR violation, block evasions which are presented in the report as evideneces. You might hate me so much because you simply defame this request in such the manner. To be clear, I hate "sockpuppetry", and "disruption" which are a perfect match to sabotage Wikipedia. "Disruption with sockpuppetry" is not tolerable at any time, any place within Wikipedia.--Appletrees (talk) 11:34, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Confirmed that Boldlyman and Yuan.C.Lee are coming from the same place.  Possible per another check that Orchis29 = Azukimonaka. Thatcher 01:31, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Mfugue is probably Red X Unrelated to the rest.
  • Hellcat Fighter is Red X Unrelated to the rest (different country)
  • Nightshadow28 is probably Red X Unrelated
  •  Likely that Brionies (talk · contribs) = Eurodollers (talk · contribs)
  • Endroit is also unrelated, per a previous check.
  •  Possible that Orchis29=Azukimonaka=KoreanShoriSenyou
  • Everything else is  Inconclusive. It is true there is a lot of logged out editing from many of these users, but I can't tell you which user belongs to which IP on which day due to the privacy policy, and I can't tie them together any more closely through technical evaluation of their editing patterns. I wish I could. Plus, editing while logged out is not a policy violation unless it is a block evasion or 3RR violation, and there is simply too much here to go into and if I did it would be too old to block for. Thatcher 02:23, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry for causing you doing job twice but this report did seem to remain everlasting (20 days!), so I filed another report on exclusively Yuan C.Lee and others due to their continuous violation on 3RR and block evasions, so Yuan.C.Lee and Boldyman are already blocked infinitely. However, harrassements I have got are mostly from the odn ip anons and Orchis29, Amazonfire and KoranShoriSenyou. I just want to know whether they're related or now. --Appletrees (talk) 01:40, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You already know, or have guessed, that most of these accounts use ODN. So it is possible that some of these users are responsible for that. Unfortunately, the question "Which user made this logged out edit" is not easy to answer in this situation for technical reasons. In the future you might try submitting simpler requests, covering 3RR violations or vandalism on one or two articles at a time or individual cases of suspected block evasion. The checkuser tool is not really geared to investigate 20 users and 100+ IP addresses in one shot. Thatcher 02:29, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I admit that this report has been accumulated and expended much as odn user's near vandalism (block evasions) during 20 days, and feel sorry for the unexpected result. As far as I've known the checkuser is a very fast way to know who violates the policy with socks. I should've just added some of 3RR incidents committed by odn users in the recent days. Anyway, thank you for your effort on this lengthy file. But I must question about KoreaShoriSenyou's naming at ANI or other place due to the name violation. --Appletrees (talk) 02:39, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk assistance requested: Please remove this request and archive it as a section on RFCU/Amazonfire (or add Amazonfire as a section here). It is likely that these editors will be as difficult to pin down as the editors at RFCU/Amazon--and indeed there is considerable overlap so that if there was something easy to see, I would have seen it already. Thatcher 19:06, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: The link to the Amazonfire fire case is here. It has already been analyzed and is archived. I will add a similar note to this case as well for future reference. I trust this is acceptable. -JodyB talk 15:34, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For the record of a related case, another extensive check user of pro-Japanese editors in the K-J line has been submitted to Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Amazonfire and been checked.--Jjok (talk) 18:43, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry for the removal of the hidden Chilipa sock pipeline, because the term is explicitly used for Korean people who aided the Japanese government during the Japanese occupation. You know that but why deliberately inserted it? You're neither Korean nor old man who undergone the period. This file is to be merged to Amazonfire case. --Appletrees (talk) 18:53, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made
above, in a new section.