Wikipedia:Editor review/Thundermaster

Thundermaster

Thundermaster (talk · contribs) I'm Thundermaster, and I joined Wikipedia a few months ago. I actively edit nearly every day on articles related to television and music and have created a couple of templates for music genres. I want to be reviewed because I want to see what others think about my progress at Wikipedia so far and I am interested to find out ways that I can improve. Thundermaster^{Thundermaster's Talk} 14:23, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews

I'd just like to bring up a quick point (Please bear in mind that I haven't checked much of your contributions but this example sprung up in my watchlist) [1]. I found your comment to the user did not WP:AGF. That I.P. happens to be a very experienced user of Wikipedia and he never changes something for the sake of it; he always has a rationale behind his edits. You could've been slightly more polite and requested the reason why he changed the colour of the template; partaking in active discussion rather than assuming that he was wrong. But that is just one issue that sticks out at me. I am not completely aware of your other contributions yet. Scarian ^Talk 15:28, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool

Questions

Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
I have done a lot of work to Spineshank-related and Hoosiers-related articles because I feel they provide quite useful information on the bands and I am also particularly pleased with my templates on music genres because they have useful navigational purpose.
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
I have been in a few conflicts with other users but I feel the conflicts have ended with me realising that I was making a mistake and apologised.