Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Qwerfjkl (bot) 9

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard. The result of the discussion was  Approved.

Operator: Qwerfjkl (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 08:12, Saturday, April 2, 2022 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: automatic

Programming language(s): JavaScript

Source code available: Just some regexps

Function overview: Mass-remove statement from articles

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Wikipedia:Bot requests#Removal of a WP:RSUW statement from around 3,000 Poland related stub articles covering small villages and rural communities

Edit period(s): One time run

Estimated number of pages affected: ~3000

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): No

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes

Function details: The bot will remove a WP:RSUW statement..."Before 1945 the area was part of Germany", per the reasons described at the BOTREQ linked above.

Discussion

• Approved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. Let's make sure this works and there aren't any further objections. Please link to this page in the edit summary. --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 17:00, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  @TheSandDoctor: See these 50 contributions (I accidentally ran this on my main account, not my bot account). ― Qwerfjkltalk 18:12, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Trial complete. For the sake of updating the status. --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 02:38, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Qwerfjkl I just wanted to check in and confirm if the trial run yielded acceptable results, and if we can now apply the bot template to the remaining articles. --E-960 (talk) 07:49, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@E-960, That is up to @TheSandDoctor (or another BAG member). ― Qwerfjkltalk 08:03, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Approved. Under normal circumstances, I would prefer to leave the close for someone else. However, given the backlog, lack of recent BAG activity (myself included), and the fact that this task is uncontroversial and based on how well the trial went, I am inclined to make an exception for this. As per usual, if amendments to - or clarifications regarding - this approval are needed, please start a discussion on the talk page and ping. --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 20:04, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard.