Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/PearBOT 3

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was

Approved.

PearBOT 3

Operator: Trialpears (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 22:35, Friday, August 30, 2019 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: automatic

Programming language(s): Python

Source code available: Standard pywikibot

Function overview: Implements page caching functionality for template calls with a long runtime, will primarily be used for automated portals.

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Wikipedia:Bot requests#A Bot to update Portal's In the news section

Edit period(s): Hourly, but longer intervals can be specified in template

Estimated number of pages affected: 1-500 depending on how many portals choose to use it.

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): Yes

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): No

Function details: Substitute the template specified in {{User:PearBOT/Template cache}} between comments  and  at time intervals specified in the template. I changed the update frequency from daily as proposed in the botreq to hourly since I found three major changes in two hours while testing, which is a lot more activity than I thought there would be. This task will be run on toolforge.

Discussion

Approved for trial (10 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. Please post results (preferably a contribs permalink) when done and take all the time you need. --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 05:46, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
TheSandDoctor, Trial complete. 10 edits, no problems found. --Trialpears (talk) 10:03, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As the original requestor for the BOT I can confirm that the output is at par with my expectation. Arman ^(Talk) 05:38, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Approved. Primefac (talk) 16:28, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.