Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/JL-Bot 8

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was  Approved.

Operator: JLaTondre (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 00:28, Wednesday, September 20, 2017 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: automatic

Programming language(s): Perl

Source code available: Available upon request

Function overview: Update WP:MCW statistics.

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): User_talk:JL-Bot#Wikipedia:WikiProject_Magazines.2FMagazines_cited_by_Wikipedia

Edit period(s): Once per month

Estimated number of pages affected: 500

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): No

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes

Function details: Extends JL-Bot 7 to provide the same functionality for WP:MCW that is currently done for WP:JCW. Parses a database dump file, extracts citation templates, calculates statistics, and saves the statistics to the project pages. The only difference will be it now looks for magazine citations as well as journal ones and will save the magazine stats to the WP:MCW pages.

Discussion

Approved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. — xaosflux ^Talk 01:54, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please run these consecutively without other tasks and post link to the contributions range when done. — xaosflux ^Talk 01:55, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Xaosflux: I had told the botop I intended to speedy approve this at Wikipedia_talk:Bots/Requests_for_approval#Wikipedia:WikiProject_Magazines.2FMagazines_cited_by_Wikipedia. It uses the exact same code as JL-Bot 7 but extends it to {{Cite magazine}}, and it only edits in project-space at a very low rate, so no chance of running awry. Would you object to me following through on what I told the botop? (Worth noting both Headbomb and Hellknowz agreed with no trial at the user talk discussion.) ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 13:54, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@BU Rob13: if you would like, I saw it pop up so figured a very fast trial would be easy enough. — xaosflux ^Talk 15:28, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Trial complete. It was easy enough to do. See here. -- JLaTondre (talk) 20:24, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The trial worked as intended, btw. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 13:30, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@JLaTondre: Approved, note this is for Wikipedia, Wikipedia_talk: namesapces only. — xaosflux ^Talk 00:53, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Approved. — xaosflux ^Talk 00:53, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.