Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/ClueBot II 3

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was

Approved.

ClueBot II 3

Operator: -- Cobi^(t|c|b)

Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic, unsupervised

Programming Language(s): PHP, wikibot.classes.php.

Function Summary: Create asteroid stubs.

Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): One long run.

Edit rate requested: maxlag = 3

Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y

Function Details: Create asteroid stubs per User:Naerii#Bored.3F. See Special:Contributions/Cobi for examples of what it will create (I ran the script in manual mode where I approved each edit).

Discussion

What about notability of these rocks? MaxSem^{(Han shot first!)} 06:47, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If they are not notable, then Naerii shouldn't be asking editors to create those stubs, and should be advised against it. I'll ask on a related WikiProject about notability. -- Cobi^(t|c|b) 07:50, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Any progress, or, reason one way or another, on why or why not these rocks are notable? My gut feeling is yes, but, I haven't had the chance to look into it yet. I'll try to here in a moment. SQL ^{Query me!} 03:20, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was considering doing this myself. If notability is satisfied, I don't see much of a problem. SQL ^{Query me!} 11:06, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, well, let's see a trial. Could you create say.... 10 such articles in your userspace cobi? Approved for trial (userspace only). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. SQL ^{Query me!} 02:48, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done - See here. -- Cobi^(t|c|b) 06:34, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks great to me, and, as it's not really controversial,

Approved. SQL ^{Query me!} 06:45, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.