Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Welland Canal Bridge 5

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:56, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welland Canal Bridge 5

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It seems to be an unnotable bridge, with nothing but passing coverage, about closures or roadwork. The original cites no sources, and it has been tagged as potentially unnotable since 2015. I think that should qualify it for deletion. Kingsmasher678 (talk) 19:48, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete it doesn't even merit anything more than a single mention in a list on the Welland Canal article. Shame, it's a nice looking bridge! Orange sticker (talk) 20:51, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It is pretty isn't it?

Kingsmasher678 (talk) 00:43, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Canada. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:56, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Old bridge, but just not enough coverage. This is about the best [1], but I don't think it's a RS. Oaktree b (talk) 04:25, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.