Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabalom Glitz (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to List of Doctor Who supporting characters. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:38, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sabalom Glitz

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor recurring character, who, despite some potential notability, does not currently meet the GNG nor SIGCOV in the article. Pokelego999 (talk) 02:48, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy, and Television. Pokelego999 (talk) 02:48, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to the List of Doctor Who characters unless improved with reception/analysis. Fails GNG as written (WP:FANCRUFT). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:55, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of Doctor Who supporting characters. Who made an article for like every single reoccurring classic Dr. Who thing ever? Because the dedication is both tragic and impressive, and if active they should really go to Tardis Data Core where they’d fit in perfectly. Dronebogus (talk) 22:25, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:SIGCOV without reception/analysis. The redirect target is a valid WP:ATD. Shooterwalker (talk) 02:57, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.