Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hoth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 05:36, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hoth

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of noteability through secondary sources. The only source mentions the -battle- of Hoth, which happened in the Empire Strikes Back. This could do with a redirect to said movie page. Jtrainor (talk) 18:22, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:16, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:17, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep since there appears to be real-world coverage here, here, here, here, here, and here. Thanks, Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 19:20, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I just revised the article to use the sources I listed above. I also housed all in-universe content under a "Fictional appearance" section, but this content could be summarized further. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 21:05, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Erik's looking beyond article's current sourcing to show WP:N through WP:NRVE. Well done. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 21:26, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Snow keep obviously, in that it's an ice planet with a small fortification on it. Also extremely well known fictional setting in multiple works. Artw (talk) 16:29, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ha! Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 16:45, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nicely played! Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 20:09, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, per sourcing found by Erik. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 16:45, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.