Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Development Counsellors International

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 14:58, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Development Counsellors International

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional piece with a history of COI editors. Google News does not show any real secondary sourcing, besides the usual mentions in rankings and business listings. No secondary sources are supplied, so that's not helpful. Drmies (talk) 14:56, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and New York. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:52, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I'm having trouble finding much of anything that would qualify towards WP:CORPDEPTH. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 19:19, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.