Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dawn Geary

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 16:26, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dawn Geary

The article was PRODed by User:Mikedrakel on 1 July 2009 with the comment, "individual does not wish to be listed on wikipedia". That PROD was contested by me on 2 July with the comment, "PRODer's only contributions have been to this page, most of them vandalism." Mikedrakel then placed {{db-author}} on the page on 9 July; this was removed by User:Cunard with the comment, "this article cannot be speedied under {{db-author}} because significant contributions have been made by Cnilep to this page." In the seven days since I contested the original PROD, however, I have only been able to locate one (sort of) reliable source. Therefore, since the subject fails WP:Notability (people), I support deletion. Cnilep (talk) 18:24, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - negligible in notability, and no references available. Tony Fox (arf!) 20:21, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no clue if subject wants out of the wikipedia; but she is clearly nn. Bigdaddy1981 (talk) 21:36, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 00:45, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Whether she wants to be in or not is irrelevant snce she is non-notable. Niteshift36 (talk) 14:30, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. —Cnilep (talk) 17:56, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I wouldn't mind inspecting that picture on her chest a little closer. ;o) Artypants, ^Babble 18:30, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Does not fit notability guidelines.--Deadchildstar (talk) 18:27, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above, interest in location of artwork notwithstanding. JNW (talk) 21:31, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.