Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Castellan (Doctor Who)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Time Lord. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:48, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Castellan (Doctor Who)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Rather minor recurring character. Despite there being some sources, it doesn't seem to meet SIGCOV or GNG. Pokelego999 (talk) 02:47, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy, and Television. Pokelego999 (talk) 02:47, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to the List of Doctor Who characters unless improved with reception/analysis. Fails GNG as written (WP:FANCRUFT). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:56, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Time Lord, since it seems to discuss a reoccurring aspect of TL culture and not a particular character. Dronebogus (talk) 22:26, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not pass WP:SIGCOV without independent reception/analysis. Redirect would be a good WP:ATD if there is a suitable target. Shooterwalker (talk) 02:52, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as there are two different redirect targets proposed. And List of Doctor Who characters won't be appropriate as it is a redirect to List of Doctor Who supporting characters so it's that article or Time Lord.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 10:49, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Still no agreement on redirection target.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:02, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Time Lord makes more sense, since the list is really just a series of one line redirects. Shooterwalker (talk) 22:29, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.