Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BBX Music
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Owen× ☎ 19:21, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
BBX Music
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- BBX Music (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
An article for a non-notable record label that was created by the owner of the record label himself. Not only is this article a clear WP:COI, but is a total WP:GNG failure as well. λ NegativeMP1 17:55, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies. λ NegativeMP1 17:55, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Turkey. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:36, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Not one of the more important indie labels per WP:MUSIC; has no notable artists. Chubbles (talk) 06:33, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: I am unable to find sufficient sources for this to meet WP:GNG let alone WP:NORG. Every reference listed is primary and unreliable. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 23:09, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Apart from the apparent lack of notability, I am concerned about a potential WP:PROMO. Aintabli (talk) 01:51, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete Fails WP:GNG.--Kadı Message 18:07, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.