Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/安

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW. Closing per unanimous consensus. — Aitias // discussion 00:09, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

安

Delete does each Chinese or Kanji character get a one-line unreferenced article - or is Wiktionary where this belongs (and already is, hence a deletion rather than than a transwiki)? There seems no claim to notability present in the article and given that the sources are likely to be in Chinese I'll let the community decide if we're due for a few thousand stubs like this as I assume that nearly all of these characters are of similar notability - like most English words. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 17:53, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete as no context. So tagged. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 21:14, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Declined CSD tag. There's not much context, but it's certainly enough to figure out what the article is about. Best, JamieS93 ^{Only You Can Prevent Drama} 21:46, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There's absolutely no point including this. Absent some sort of showing that this character has a special meaning or history (and I can't think of any), it's simply not notable. Tim Song (talk) 01:21, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Chinese characters are sometimes necessary in article titles to disambiguate between different characters with the same pronunciation, but this doesn't seem to apply in this case. Badagnani (talk) 02:09, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If there's a suitable target, redirect to it (I cannot suggest one myself, as I do not know Chinese). Otherwise, delete as more suitable for a dictionary and lack of notability. Cheers. lifebaka++ 03:28, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, possible speedy delete for no real content - it doesn't even say directly what the character means, and I didn't need this article to figure out that this was a character from an East Asian script. Not a plausible search term for anything on the English Wikipedia. We have articles on peace and tranquility and a disambiguation for quiet, which is what the character seems to translate to. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 16:18, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No redirect either, since it is an unlikely search term on the English WP. Niteshift36 (talk) 06:58, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.