User talk:SophieHadifz

Hello, SophieHadifz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! —DIYeditor (talk) 07:25, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply] Getting started Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Hello, I'm JimRenge. I noticed that you recently removed content from Religion in Pakistan without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. JimRenge (talk) 17:39, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I notice you have a habit of removing material from various Islamic topics and then mismarking your edit summaries without reason. For example, calling an entire 2-3paragraph re-write a "Typo" while injecting your subjective opinion. This is bullshit. Please stop. It is easy enough to reverse your vandalism that I don't see what you hope to gain by it. Thank you. -Anon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.77.126.20 (talk) 18:29, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Islam in Pakistan into Religion in Pakistan. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:56, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Al-Lat has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Auric talk 11:16, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Philipnelson99. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to T-Series (company)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Philipnelson99 (talk) 08:07, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pescetarianism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vegetarian diet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Nine Lives (2016 film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:57, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Please don't add your own personal analysis of what critics said. We already have two review aggregators that we use for this purpose. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:58, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What SophieHadifz added to the Nine Lives (2016 film) lead seems like a fair summary of what is said, and sourced, within the Nine_Lives_(2016_film)#Critical_reception section. No need to source it again.--Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 13:42, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't censor words in articles, as you did in Red hair. Wikipedia isn't censored, and in your case all you did was break a URL within a cite, and alter a word elsewhere in the article that had nothing to do with it ("associate"). Thanks. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 13:42, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And I see you went ahead and repeated the same edit again. Please don't do this. It may be taken to be disruptive vandalism. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 22:37, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Only subjects with articles get mentioned on disambiguation pages.★Trekker (talk) 17:42, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Avicenna. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Wario-Man (talk) 18:15, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Avicenna. - LouisAragon (talk) 10:27, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What's the matter with you, man? Are you on Wikipedia just to vandalize some well articulated articles? Be sane, man. PerennialThinker (talk) 16:34, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Doug Weller talk 18:21, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly add some more languages so that the languages with population 20 million may be shown here.182.186.66.91 (talk) 13:15, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SophieHadifz, an IP changed one of your recent edits to List of languages by total number of speakers and removed Bhojpuri from the list. Will you kindly re-check the source? Love —LiliCharlie (talk) 15:33, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is specifically regarding this edit. I understand why Crowder would belong in Category:American critics of Islam, but this needs to be supported in the article, with a reliable source, first. Categories are for things which are regularly used by reliable sources as defining traits. This is explained in WP:CATDEF. Categories follow articles, not the other way around, and categories are not the right place to introduce information about topics. Thanks. Grayfell (talk) 04:55, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jessicapierce. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Karim Metwaly, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 19:02, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Karim Metwaly, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 19:02, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Very strongly recommended. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:55, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Karim Metwaly, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Epic Rap Battles of History, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Real.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Dr. Sabeel Ahmed requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 🆔 APO ^Discuss✍ 04:00, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Craig Considine (academic), was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 🆔 APO ^Discuss✍ 04:02, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Migration to Abyssinia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Calmness, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Free.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:28, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Manichaeism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spiritual.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shamsi Ali, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Indonesian and American.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Abdol Hossein Sardari, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Azerbaijani.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at 1996, you may be blocked from editing. Elizium23 (talk) 19:42, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dalai Lama Center for Peace and Education, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Humanity.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eternal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited God in the Baháʼí Faith, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eternal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Bible, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Bettering the Wiki (talk) 05:41, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Everything, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page All.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Bleach (manga), please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. Xexerss (talk) 01:24, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Storybooth requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Storybooth. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. NotAGenious (talk) 19:20, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop recreating Storybooth. It's deeply inappropriate, especially considering that you recreate it with essentially zero content. If you recreate it again, I'll block you. You are, however, free to create it as a draft, as per WP:AFC. You'll need to work hard to demonstrate WP:NOTE and must not submit the draft article until you have done so. --Yamla (talk) 19:33, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I feel like I should have link their channel or create something bigger. SophieHadifz (talk) 19:40, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Divinity. --Yamla (talk) 11:16, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Disgrace (disambiguation). There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 22:20, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Muhammad: The Last Prophet, you may be blocked from editing. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 22:22, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Simple living, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lifestyle.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:06, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Storybooth requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Storybooth. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Grabup (talk) 07:46, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributions have been repeatedly completely inappropriate and I warned you if you recreated Storybooth yet again, I would block you. You did so, therefore I have blocked you indefinitely. WP:GAB explains how to contest your block. For future reviewers, note that the problems are far deeper than just recreating garbage articles. --Yamla (talk) 11:30, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]