User talk:Ratnahastin

As per your comment, I have removed those sources in the in the required draft added new ones. Now is it okay to be moved to Wiki article status? Mohammad Umar Ali (talk) 06:34, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, I'm still seeing sources from 19th and early 20th centuries. You should replace them with modern scholarly sources. Ratnahastin (talk) 06:39, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now please check once again Mohammad Umar Ali (talk) 07:17, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's good for now, another reviewer may review it in the future til then you can try improving it by citing more reliable sources. Thanks. Ratnahastin (talk) 08:55, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you nominate Conquest of Mandalgarh, Conquest of Hadoti, Conquest of Ajmer, Prince Salim's Invasion of Mewar as it is created by a sockpuppet banned account Rudra Simha (talk) 10:29, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to Sri Lanka, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

TarnishedPath^talk 12:39, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I saw you had two issues with a wikipedia draft I wrote today.

1.) Non-reliable sources

I added many more sources, doubling the amount of sources. Sources now include Taipei Times, FEI (International Fencing Federation), and official records from the 2018 YOG Summer Olympic Games.

2.) Not notable

Chen Yi-Tung has qualified for the 2024 Paris Olympics which most people would consider highly notable. He has also been officially congratulated by Taiwanese embassies which I have also included in the article.

Is it possible you could re-review this submission? Thank you!

Draft:Chen Yi-tung - Wikipedia FantomDev (talk) 20:21, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ratnahastin. Just letting you know as a courtesy, I have undone your draftification the article Philip Chronican because I believe it meets WP:GNG. If you disagree, feel free to discuss or nominate for AfD. — GMH Melbourne (talk) 04:56, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]