User talk:Myselfajar

Hi Myselfajar! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. DANGA14^talk 01:05, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The user is trying to vandalise articles by sexualing those articles. I request you to please ban his IP address because this is against Wikipedia guidelines. Myselfajar (talk) 01:13, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 01:42, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Bbb23 ,

This user is definitely the sockpuppet of @Suryavanshiexe. Just notice his pattern . As soon as he made his account, he started editing same articles like Ujjainiya Jagdishpur estate and Kunwar Singh same like @Suryavanshiexe and even got involved in Edit warring with me. I truly appreciate your sharp intuition. Sankul Rai (talk) 02:03, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Myselfajar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I just reverted the edit which was sexualised by the user. Sexuling an article is a policy of Wikipedia. How does that make me sock? Myselfajar (talk) 01:48, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You tell us. 331dot (talk) 08:12, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.