User talk:Fragrant Peony/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hi Fragrant Peony! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Blaze The Wolf (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Bryson Tiller: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Bestagon ⬡ 13:35, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

Yes, you're absolutely right. Thanks for the links! Fragrant Peony (talk) 13:39, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

Also, if you're doing a lot of recent changes patrol, tools like redwarn and twinkle makes it much easier (I personally use redwarn) - AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 11:42, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

That's very helpful! Thanks a lot. Fragrant Peony (talk) 14:58, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

In this edit you reverted the addition by an IP-user of the relationship between Juliette Gréco and Jean-Pierre Wimille. But on Gréco's page the relationship is mentioned, and that seems to me to be reliably sourced. I am not sure whether it is relevant enough to include in their biographies, though. Just wanted to draw your attention to the source. Mark in wiki (talk) 10:12, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Thank you Mark in wiki, I undid my redo and then added a BBC source next to it. Fragrant Peony (talk) 12:39, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Please explain what I did wrong re Lauren Weisberger article. Thanks. 107.127.46.37 (talk) 03:48, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

You removed a huge content without writing an Edit Summary. Fragrant Peony (talk) 03:52, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

With all due respect, and for the record, I did leave an edit summary (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:History/Lauren_Weisberger). Please review diffs. You may agree with some or all of the edits. Yours. 107.127.46.37 (talk) 04:30, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi! I took the liberty of fixing the auto-archiving settings at the top of this page. I've also added {{Archives}}, so that the list of archives will be automatically shown. --rchard2scout (talk) 12:51, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Of course you can! I truly appreciate it. Thank you rchard2scout.

If you see someone obviously only vandalising pages, consider reporting them to WP:AIV (under the 3 dots, or more options tab in RedWarn) - AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 05:19, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Noted! Many thanks AssumeGoodWraith. Fragrant Peony (talk) 01:04, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

I forgot to leave an edit summary explaining deletions. Will redo. Thanks. 107.127.46.39 (talk) 04:37, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Regarding your re insertion of the paragraph from Christine Collins page / and her search for (her son) was chronicled in the fictional film The Changeling is not completely true.

Wondering your thoughts on this? The film changeling is a fictional film, based on events that took place at Wineville chicken coops. Regarding Christine Collins, there is no doubt that she continued to hope that her son was still alive and could be found (rather than face the truth of the matter regarding his actual death). When we say that the film chronicled Christine Collins, we are simply not correct. The author of the screenplay has stated publicly that he wrote the film from the viewpoint of how he imagined Christine Collins would behave. We have no actual proof that this was how she behaved, other than she did continue to search for her son. To suggest that the film is a true story that chronicled in detail how Christine Collins behaved, can never be surmised as she died in 1946 (as I recall).

Really just wondering if we should remove the part that you re-instated, "the film chronicled Christine Collins search for her son". We just don't know what actually happened. The screenplay was just an imagined sequence that may or may not have ever occurred.

Beaconboy (talk) 21:53, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello Beaconboy;

The section you highlighted was not written by me; I undid the IP address that removed the content without an edit summary. I would appreciate it if you removed it along with an explanation. Thanks! Fragrant Peony (talk) 12:04, 21 January 2022 (UTC)