User talk:Discospinster/Archive43

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Can you put on K6kas page that there is a sock puppet investigation on him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ilovethesims5 (talk • contribs) 17:43, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

No because it's not a good-faith investigation. ... discospinster _talk 17:47, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Thank you, same to you! ... discospinster _talk 14:17, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

I tried to move pages but you stopped me in 2 seconds. So can you please move "Zagreb Airport" to "Zagreb International Airport" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ciaobella9 (talk • contribs) 23:55, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

You can't move a page by cutting and pasting content. If you are unable to move it the standard way, you can request a move at WP:REQMOVE. ... discospinster _talk 00:01, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

your problem — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iwantitnow (talk • contribs) 08:03, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Discospinster

The Company is ceasing operations and on top of it the page included factually incorrect information.

I am the current CEO of the Company and responsible for winding down the Company.

As such, please allow me to edit it or please permanently take down the page until further notice.

Thanks,

98.113.173.157 (talk) 00:23, 6 January 2015 (UTC)Joseph

You can edit it to reflect its current status and remove incorrect statements but you can't remove the entire article. ... discospinster _talk 00:24, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Hello I am Om and sorry I made a mistake please sorry — Preceding unsigned comment added by Omgupta45 (talk • contribs) 16:49, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

I made an edit on the Kalam Cosmological Argument page because the previous editor named Dan Barker as a critic of the argument alongside those who were actually qualified to make criticisms. Barker is not a scientist or a philosopher. J.L Mackie, Quentin Smith, and Michael Martin are philosophers and Paul Davies, Lawrence Kraus, and Victor Stenger are scientists. Whoever made those edits even gave Barker his own criticisms. Barker is a layman, nothing more. Putting him on there as an authority is like putting David Silverman or The Amazing Atheist as an authority. I could have made more edits since it all seemed biased put I decided to leave it at excising Barker since his inclusion was most clearly a mistake. Even a Dawkins fanboy would concede with that. I suppose some amateur new atheist read his book, loved it, and decided to include it. I hate to draw conclusions like that but if the editor was actually well read then he would have cited actual science and actual philosophy. Please take this into consideration before you remove my edits. It would be a mistake to misinform people into thinking that Barker is qualified or that his arguments are valid. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.84.77.224 (talk) 22:14, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Fine, but you have to briefly say in the edit summary why you are removing the content. ... discospinster _talk 22:17, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

HI I am Chris father of Andy Biersack I would really appreciate it if you would stop editing my sons page after I edited my daughter in law couldn't edit it so I'm here trying to so please. Thank you -Chris & Amy Biersack — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChrisBiersack (talk • contribs) 22:37, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Please do not add false information to articles. ... discospinster _talk 22:40, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Can you keep an eye on the page if who adding unsourced genre. 183.171.180.118 (talk) 16:20, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

OK. ... discospinster _talk 21:31, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I removed the bit on this page because it for some reason had been repeated, so I removed all the articles on the page that were repeated. I hope it hasn't inconvenienced you. JRRobinson (talk) 17:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

It doesn't inconvenience me, but when you remove a big chunk of content without saying why in the edit summary, it gets confusing. ... discospinster _talk 21:30, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

The Wall Street Crash was in 1928.

Eric — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.100.59.191 (talk) 03:48, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Your information is out dated and unsubstantiated. There are dozens of clinical studies that now prove without a shadow of a doubt the effectiveness of EFT.

Please review the following article in the Journal of Psychology, 2013 and update you information. http://tappingsolutionfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Clinical-EFT-as-Evidenced-Based-Practice.pdf

My Father is a profession EFT couch who studied with Gary Craig and over 10 Years I have seen people come to him with all sorts of phobias such as agoraphobia, aquaphobia. The man with agoraphobia had never been able to take his children to the park, the lady with aquaphobia had never been able to go swimming or even take a bath. Both now free of their fears and living life stress free. Dozens of people with severe allergies, emotional traumas, women who had been sexually abused and in therapy for a life time after 1-5 sessions with my Dad transformed.

Read the research and hold yourself accountable for providing what clinical studies have now proven. EFT is an effective therapeutic tool and you a doing a disservice to those in search of help by not providing the true scope this method has to offer those in need. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Angela10336 (talk • contribs) 23:15, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

You can't copy and paste content from other sources, like [1], as this brings up copyright issues. ... discospinster _talk 02:22, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

But that dude's penis fell out and I included a reference link.

There's no apparent reason why this should be mentioned in his Wikipedia article. Was this an event that got noticed in the media? Did newspapers write articles about it? ... discospinster _talk 02:40, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

I'd be hard pressed to find any print journalism about Clifford Starks, but media in the sporting niche covered his penis falling out of his shorts. Note the reference link from Karyn Bryant, Fox Sports 1 onscreen personality and host of much UFC content. It's the most distinguishable part of his career.

Then you should be able to find sources that verify this. ... discospinster _talk 02:51, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Sure. Here's the aforementioned Karyn Bryant talking with the man, Clifford Starks, about how his penis fell out at the weigh-ins. Wikipedia will not let me include the external link here so you'll have to fill in the (DOT) to review. It has been queued up to the comments about his penis. http://youtu (DOT) be/h1yd-lnebNc?t=2m11s

...

Based on your lack of response I'm feeling you deemed that interview is sufficient, I'll amend the Clifford Starks entry again shortly to include when his penis fell out at the UFC 137 weigh-ins.

My lack of response was due to being away from the computer. I still don't think that the interview is sufficient to establish that this is an event worthy of being entered into an encyclopedia article. If it was more widely covered in the media then perhaps. ... discospinster _talk 13:43, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

There isn't more prominent coverage of Clifford Starks altogether. If applying the same scrutiny to the man as you do to his penis falling out, it's difficult to justify his inclusion in an encyclopedia at all. National cable media such as Karyn Bryant of Fox Sports 1 documenting and addressing the time his penis fell out with him on video at the event doesn't stand out as unworthy among the other sources cited.

I am wondering whether all these advertising editors on Sue Wong are actually the same person - in addition to Allenchai, please see Emelray, ISP one, and LukeSueWong (Sue Wong's son, seemingly). Note the claim in this edit summary that a message was left at "the office" by Sue Wong's PR. Apparently the subject has been making commands from on high as to what she wants on her article, including that her age not be publicised and forbidding use of File:Sue Wong 2014.JPG in the article - all fair enough, but rather a shame. But there's definitely some kind of PR campaign going on with this article. Mabalu (talk) 22:11, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Yes I agree it's probably the same person. It happens sometimes, a subject of an article wants it to reflect a certain view of the person, which is understandable, but they can't control what goes in it unless there is a biographies of living persons violation. Not to mention copyright issues that usually arise (i.e. pasting the text from the official web page without realising that they are automatically offering the content under a Creative Commons licence which can then be used by anyone). ... discospinster _talk 23:39, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Please be so kind as to point me to the WP policy that states that a WP editor cannot criticize WP. ParvisStPierre (talk) 00:15, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

You can criticise all you want, but it doesn't belong in an encyclopedia article. Please refer to WP:OR and WP:NEUTRAL for relevant policies. ... discospinster _talk 00:16, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Don´t act if you were stupid. You are not stupid. I have a criticism of WP. And I have the right to criticize WP which you cannot deny me. So, don´t act as if you were stupid. You are not stupid. You know very well that any WP editor has the right to criticize WP. Go and ask Jimmy Wales about that. You are not stupid. You are not going to fool me acting as if you were stupid. I know you are not stupid. ParvisStPierre (talk) 00:22, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

OK whatever, just don't add your personal commentary to articles. ... discospinster _talk 00:24, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Please indicate the WP policy that states I am not allowed to criticize WP. Thank you. ParvisStPierre (talk) 00:26, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

There is no WP policy that states I -as a WP editor - cannot criticize WP. And you and everyone else on WP know that. So, I will go ahead and state my criticisms of WP on the "Criticisms of WP" page. Thank you very much. ParvisStPierre (talk) 00:32, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

If you continue to add your own complaints to the Wikipedia article, you will be blocked. ... discospinster _talk 00:33, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

I ask you again: please indicate the WP policy that states I cannot criticize WP? Or, I would appreciate it very much if you could be so kind as to indicate the WP policy that specifically states that a WP editor is forbidden from criticizing WP. Thank you. ParvisStPierre (talk) 00:37, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

No original research and Neutral point of view are the policies. ... discospinster _talk 00:38, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

I am not doing original research: I simply have a view I want to state about WP. It is a personal opinion from personal experience: neutrality is not relevant. This is completely personal. ParvisStPierre (talk) 00:42, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Neither No original research nor Neutral point of view state that a WP editor is forbidden from criticizing WP. I thus have the right to criticize WP. ParvisStPierre (talk) 00:44, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

You are not going to fool me acting as if you were stupid. I know you are not stupid. Your opinion doesn't belong in articles. The policies were linked for you. Please don't pretend to be stupid. --Onorem (talk) 00:45, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

And ParvisStPierre now warned for edit warring in case this has to go to go that way. Meters (talk) 00:56, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

I am not adding any content in the article here on the talk page: thus, it is impossible for me to "edit war" here on the talk page. How thick and stupid you are!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! But, thank you very much for your very useful contributions: now I know that a WP editor is (unofficially) prohibited from criticizing WP - which is, obviously, completely contrary to the basic principles of WP (which you thick and stupid lot here on this talk page obviously know nothing about). You are all very stupid - that is for sure: thick and stupid, as we say in my ´hood. Well, there is nothing we can do about it: you thick and stupid lot will take "good" care of this thick and stupid WP online encyclopedia (you lot do not realize how thick and stupid your are: imagine: accusing me of edit warring on the talk page!!!!! What utter stupidity!!!!!! And stating that a WP editor cannot criticize WP!!!!!!! What utter stupidity on your part!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!ParvisStPierre (talk) 01:25, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

1. IamCharlie ParvisStPierre (talk) 01:33, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

So let me state it loud and clear: ANY WP EDITOR HAS THE RIGHT TO CRITICIZE WIKIPEDIA REGARDING ANY MATTER. ParvisStPierre (talk) 01:50, 11 January 2015 (UTC) (Everybody knows that, actually!)

1. IamCharlie ParvisStPierre (talk) 01:50, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Editors are free to criticize Wikipedia, but not in articles. Please stop using other peoples' talkpages as a forum for complaints: you can post what you want, within reason, on your own talkpage. Acroterion (talk) 02:03, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for reverting the vandalism on my userpage. Much appreciated! :) Orphan Wiki 18:04, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

No problem. ... discospinster _talk 12:46, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Take care. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 06:08, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

You are welcome. ... discospinster _talk 12:43, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Good job with all your recent crackdowns on the crazy edits by 64.203.49.244 Eklxtreme (talk) 03:19, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

For removal of prods in Juan Ruiz Healy you blocked Jburrola5 (talk · contribs · block log). Did you notice that Mburrola (talk⁺ · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser) was created a few hours later? Sam ^Sing! 12:01, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

No, I guess I hadn't gone back to the article right away. ... discospinster _talk 12:56, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

• Please Wikipedia:Revert_only_when_necessary 183.178.222.138 (talk) 17:11, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

• Diff List: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_mobile_phone_makers_by_country&diff=642013762&oldid=641978233
• Diff List: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_mobile_phone_makers_by_country&diff=642149897&oldid=642134642

Hey, glad I could help get the ugly vandal stuff off your page. Also, thanks for letting me know you appreciated it, otherwise I never would have looked at your userpage and used that as a starting point to (finally) get my userboxes nice and centered on my page. I had tried it once before but the code errors were driving me nuts. Thanks again! RegistryKey^(RegEdit) 16:46, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

I'm just surprised anyone looks at my user page lol. ... discospinster _talk 18:20, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

I want to know if Wikipedia doesn't sensor than why can't I take something that isn't true off the page. It's dosrespectful and ignorant to have phi gamma deltas letters on a page. Idk why it just can't be taken down — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bdudukovich (talk • contribs) 15:18, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

There are many reasons why it can't be taken down, and they are explained in an FAQ on the article's talk page. ... discospinster _talk 15:21, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Fee tail, has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. MiguelMadeira (talk) 11:40, 6 February 2015 (UTC) --MiguelMadeira (talk) 11:40, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Extend PC time? --George Ho (talk) 18:42, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Nothing has happened since February 23, so we'll keep an eye out for now. ... discospinster _talk 21:44, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Is Discosprinter you? It looks rather like no, but wanted to check. --kelapstick^(bainuu) 16:56, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

No that's not me. Just a reasonable facsimile. Thanks for letting me know. ... discospinster _talk 20:58, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Also User talk:Johnes8745johnes8745, seems like you have a fan... --kelapstick^(bainuu) 16:58, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Weird. I haven't even been very active lately, so who could I have pissed off? ... discospinster _talk 20:58, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Well, imitation is the most sincere form of flattery, so you must have been doing something right, both accounts are blocked and pages deleted. --kelapstick^(bainuu) 21:06, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

User talk:نبيل عبدالقادر عبدالوهاب — Preceding unsigned comment added by Slayer is awesome and cool (talk • contribs) 21:10, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

The user has only edited one article so far, so blocking might be too much. I will keep an eye on it. ... discospinster _talk 00:15, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Well, I removed the content because it does not have enough information, just as I did with É Você and No Final. But I do not know the information, because it was not disclosed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sophiaabrahaomusic (talk • contribs) 20:09, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

If there is not enough information then you should add it, not remove it. ... discospinster _talk 20:13, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

CRYSTAL JAVIA (talk) 21:21, 27 March 2015 (UTC)CRYSTAL hello,

Please do not delete my article because it contains information about brand YOTO. which is suddenly growing since last two years in youngsters mind. people should have their proper knowledge that's why i had created it.

Hi Discospinster,

I noticed the edits to The Mod Squad, and was looking at a bit. It seems that Worldvision Enterprises is a real distribution company, and at least IMDB (perhaps not the /most/ WP:RS out there) cites it as one for The Mod Squad. I am still concerned a bit though given the edits from that IP today. (all seeming to be along the same lines) I also noticed that the IP belongs to a "Communication" company, and I'm not sure there is COI or not. Along with that - there seem to be a series of "warnings" issues over the years to that IP. I'm not confidant enough to just blindly revert all of today's edits (including his revert to your revert), but perhaps in a few weeks I can help look into this if you'd like. I'm basically leaving this note to you as a placeholder to my own contribs so I can look back when I have more time. Cheers. — Ched :  ?  01:57, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

I've encountered this (type of) editor before and I found it's just easier to revert on sight than to check every single edit (assuming it's something that can be checked). Sure, one or two of the edits might be valid but it's a very low percentage and trying to verify is a waste of other editors' time. ... discospinster _talk 12:37, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

hi you asked for som feed bak if there is some an i think fhat there is no feed back needed you did wonderfully

For two times, you instantly reverted the edit I did on this article. I supose you use some kind of automatism for this. Anyway, The edit I did was not vandalism: Portugal's "prime minister" at the time, António Salazar, was indeed a dictator, as you can confirm by readind wikipedia's own article on him. I am both portuguese and an historian, if that helps, although I guess I can also say I'm the king of Scotland and it won't matter...

Thank you.

It didn't need to be changed in the place that you changed it. "Portugal's Prime Minister António Salazar allowed him to settle there on the condition that he completely abstain from politics." It doesn't make it better to change "Prime Minister" to "dictator" because it doesn't add any meaning. ... discospinster _talk 12:36, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

For thousands of portuguese that suffered under Salazar's dictatorship's brutal repression and politics, yes it add's meaning, in the sense that to see him being called simply "Prime Minister" is a terrible eufemism and an insult. Also, for those unfamiliar with portuguese history, as I think most of the people who will read Fulgencio Batista's article here, I do believe it is important to mention that Batista, himself a dictator, was welcomed by a country that was ruled by another dictator, not a democratic regime. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.137.229.50 (talk) 11:35, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Using such a term violates Wikipedia's policy on neutrality: see WP:Neutral. If it's significant that one dictator is welcomed by another, then there should be some secondary source that notes it, which can be cited in the Batista article. ... discospinster _talk 22:52, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Do you need a secondary source to call Hitler or Mussolini a dictator? In fact, Hitler was ellected democratly and Mussolini was nominally Italy's Prime-Minister, but you don't need any secondary sources to call them dictators, right? For God's sake, just read Salazar's bio right here in wikipedia, where there's plenty of secondary sources that say just that! Fulgêncio Batista's own article here in wikipedia call's him a dictator also, with secondary sources, also! Does one need to fill the articles with secondary sources to prove proven and backed up facts? This is not a matter of opinion, bias or whatever. Salazar's regime had a political police, political prisons, it used torture and assassination tactics against its oponents, what more do you need?

Anyway, I found a scholarly source for this obvious claim: HOROWITZ, Irving Louis & SUCHLICKI, Jaime, "Cuban Communism: 1959-2003", New Jersey, Transaction Publishers, 11th ed., 2003, p. 34. Quoting: "Alas, Batistas travails were not many. Another dictator, Oliveira Salazar of Portugal, granted Batista asylum on the condition that (...)". By the way, Irving Louis Horowitz was (died in 2012) Hannah Arendt Distinguished University Professor Emeritus of Sociology and Political Science at Rutgers University, in case you question this source. He was also a member of the board of Radio y Televisión Martí, a radio and television international broadcaster based in Miami, Florida, financed by the Federal government of the United States through the Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG), which transmits newscasts and programs in Spanish to Cuba, so I doubt he can be acused of pro-Castro or left-leaning bias, in case you're wondering. So... may I now finally edit the article?

With the source provided it is more in line with Wikipedia's policies. It's not a matter of getting my permission to edit the article, just making sure that opinions are not inserted. ... discospinster _talk 23:08, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Gave them a DS alert. Loved the changing of book titles. Dougweller (talk) 18:05, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. ... discospinster _talk 12:33, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi discospinster,

This is in regards to a few sections that apparently keep reverting. Fristly, the "Notable Alumni" selection is NOT an accurate transcription, as there has been no clear references to their actual existence at the school. To compare this to pages like Cawthra Park Secondary School (where almost all of their alumni are referenced), there are little to no references in this quadrant.

In addition, there are no references in another section: the section regarding the computer competitions Glenforest participated in. Since you removed the Super Smash Bros. Melee section due to lack of references, you should also remove the alumni section and the computer competition sections since they have had no reputable references. Please keep these facts in mind, and do not revert them back. I've been trying to remove these sections because, again, there have been no clear reputable references to either the alumni or the computer competitions.

Looking back on the edit history, I sincerely apologise for failing to explain the reasons for removing these sections in the talk function, as I am still relatively new to the editing system.

I am an alumnus of the school and having had contact with many of the school's administration, these are my justifications.

Thank you. 2620:22:4000:1008:3FFD:D5B1:1A29:A7A6 (talk) 16:24, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

That's fair. But it's always a good idea to use an edit summary, even if brief, so others will know what you are meaning to do. ... discospinster _talk 14:43, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

See the ceiling fans in the gallery of Mohonk Mountain House. Softlavender (talk) 17:30, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. I can't block on the Wikimedia Commons but I reverted the change of images there. ... discospinster _talk 17:41, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Appreciated. Can you contact a Commons admin to block? Otherwise, perhaps Acroterion can contact a Commons admin? Softlavender (talk) 17:57, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

I did file a report and the user has been blocked. ... discospinster _talk 18:19, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Yay! Thank you. Softlavender (talk) 18:29, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for bringing it to my attention. ... discospinster _talk 21:02, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

I was Just trying to help — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.206.182.116 (talk) 04:13, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi Discospinster. I got your notice on removal of my editions because of "spam links". I consider these editions of mine as much relevant regarding the subject. These gives details about democratic background to countries and the links used are correct references to source. Let me know if you disagree or if I can change the content somehow. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.254.1.56 (talk) 15:06, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

They might be relevant but we don't have an indication that the information is authoritative. What or who is "MaxRange"? What is the document? If it's the result of a study, where is the rest of the information about the study? It's just not clear where the data are coming from. ... discospinster _talk 15:10, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

I deleted a large amount of data from that page. You'll note that the page is being hijacked to promote an incredibly obscure Chicago band called "The Squids." While LaTour may have in fact been a member of the group, the group themselves had no major press, airplay or charting singles or albums. They had a Wikipedia page that I reported (every two bit bar band does not deserve an entry here) that was deleted. It appears that the founder of the group has instead decided to use LaTour's page to promote his defunct attempt at a musical career. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CE3F:BB0:E971:F7B7:9545:225B (talk) 15:32, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

The problem is that you didn't explain what you were doing in the edit summary so it looks like there is no reason for it. Edit summaries are important, especially if you are make a major change such as that one. ... discospinster _talk 18:15, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

It was not a mistake, I did it on purpose! M briglia05 (talk) 23:13, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Well you shouldn't do that because it's vandalism. ... discospinster _talk 03:45, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for your help!

PureRED (talk) 14:20, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Thank you. ... discospinster _talk 14:22, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Understand that Zionism is antisemitism. This is the truth. --2001:1388:B4A:6704:95D7:E075:FA89:C2E9 (talk) 03:15, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia is about verifiability, not "truth". ... discospinster _talk 03:16, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

also looks like he did a nasty thing on a talk page Talk:Times GabonWgolf (talk) 00:12, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

I've removed that as well. ... discospinster _talk 00:12, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thank you for your counter-vandalism work and for speedily catching vandalism on my page. Always happy to meet a fellow Canadian too! /wia /talk 00:20, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, eh. ... discospinster _talk 00:22, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

you're a silly derp. it's a b'day present you square leave it for 5 minutes please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.17.235.219 (talk) 02:18, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Might I suggest a gift card instead. ... discospinster _talk 12:19, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi! Since you're experienced with music articles, would you be interested in reviewing my FAC for the article xx (album)? Apart from some hollow support votes, it's really received only one complete review, so any feedback would be appreciated. Dan56 (talk) 17:09, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

I actually don't have that much experience with music articles, at least not substantively. Most of my editing on them is vandalism-reverting and removing unsourced information. Good luck though. ... discospinster _talk 18:37, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

If this is not the place to advertise manufacturers, please delete all references in every pallet page to any manufacturers. Including CHEP. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.191.10.217 (talk) 23:01, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

CHEP already has an article, so that's why it's linked within the pallets page. ... discospinster _talk 23:02, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

As you have still not taken down any reference to CHEP, I will continue to add the information back on.

Please see WP:PLUG. ... discospinster _talk 23:04, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Hello,

You need to be aware that many of the units you have put onto this age arre not Special Forces but Special Operations Forces (yes there is a difference!). Pease edit this page to include SFs only not SOFs. I have served with many of both types of units and they don't like being confused with echother becuase their roles are different. So please edit the page for educations sake, this is nothing personal! I am mainly talking about the UNited States so called "list of SFs". The US Marines and US AirForce does not have a Special Forces unit withn their service but they do hvae SOFs like the US Marine Recon and the USAF Pararescue.

On another note the only reason I changed some major titlements up the top of the page is to inform the audience that this is not a list of SFs but many are SOFs and I gave them what the differene is between the two. They are both elite but they are different and my SF and SOF mates don't like being confused with the other becuase there is a rivalry.

Kind Regards,

MilitaryHistoryGuru — Preceding unsigned comment added by Militaryhistoryguru (talk • contribs) 01:42, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

	Throwback Thursday Award
	If anyone understands the concept of Throwback Thursday, it's you. Drmies (talk) 02:00, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

That is very kind of you. ... discospinster _talk 02:01, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Inventiorlist (talk · contribs) made the same addition about Leo Szilárd like the account Invetorlist (talk · contribs), which is a confirmed sockpuppet of Stubes99. It is clear that Inventiorlist belongs to the same banned user. 213.229.69.40 (talk) 21:08, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

OK I have blocked the account. ... discospinster _talk 21:12, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

He created a new account and restored the same info. Please block his new sock Againt frustrated chauvinist slovak IP (talk · contribs). 85.234.133.142 (talk) 06:10, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

I added this information to the link and I deemed it very appropriate, being a well known Asbury Park artist for more than 20 years. I have been paying tribute to Asbury Park and the subject of Tillie and it is well documented throughout the years. As I said I deemed it very appropriate. If Bruce Springsteen is tied to this for just singing a couple of songs and posing in front of Tillie, then my work is well deserving of it also.

Patricia Arroyo

Bruce Springsteen has his own article in Wikipedia as being well-known, so it's cross-linked with this one. There is no Wikipedia article for Patricia Arroyo, and the Tillie article is not the right place for the link. Please see Wikipedia:External links for guidance. ... discospinster _talk 01:06, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

film drishyam is going to release on my birthday,,thats way i am mentioning there,,if you wary about that,,then move the respected release date ,, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Biki Gupta (talk • contribs) 16:00, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

releasing date of film drishyam going to release on my birth day ,,thats way i was mention there,, if u wary about that ,,then please move that respected releasing date of film drishyam..its my right,,and you cant ignore its,,as we think — Preceding unsigned comment added by Biki Gupta (talk • contribs) 16:06, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

It's not relevant to the article that it's your birthday. ... discospinster _talk 16:12, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Hi there, I have repeatedly been unable to edit Stucco housing co-operative, a page for the student housing that I live in. I am a director of the space and have attempted to modify it, in goos taste. can me edits please be reinstated?

Best Wishes, Llewellyn — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.108.234.94 (talk) 16:08, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, Wikipedia is not a place for making jokes about your friends. ... discospinster _talk 16:11, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

As we know well about that ,, wikipedia is not a joke,, but its have responsibility to do not ignore any kind of topic ,, either its related with common man ya famous person as it terms &condition..indicate — Preceding unsigned comment added by Biki Gupta (talk • contribs) 16:23, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Hello

My current IP address has been blocked as I attempted to update several links on the cell lines pages in May 2015. These links were already present but took users to out of date pages or an error message. I work for Public Health England, a not for profit organisation; the company was previously called the Health Protection Agency. Public Health England (PHE) operates four unique collections consisting of expertly preserved, authenticated cell lines and microbial strains of known provenance for use in medical science and laboratory healthcare. Cultures from the PHE collections are used by scientists who need to reassure themselves and others that the materials they are using are authentic, so the conclusions to their studies are valid and relevant.

Please can you unblock this IP address so I can create an account and update the information on your pages?

Many thanks for your help.

This IP address is not currently blocked, otherwise you wouldn't be able to leave a message on my talk page. ... discospinster _talk 17:13, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Who is this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 113.193.145.56 (talk) 18:33, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

I don't know, can you give me a hint? ... discospinster _talk 18:35, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Hi I have just updated my biog. I am now broadcasting with Belfast 89 fm. The page link to U105fm is no longer there as I left them a few years ago. Best Hendi Aka Michael Henderson — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.18.185.217 (talk) 14:31, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

OK but in the process you are removing mark up that shouldn't be removed. Try using WP:PREVIEW before saving to make sure that nothing gets mangled. ... discospinster _talk 14:33, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Why you deleted my changes made by me in Internet of Things? I am 100% sure I followed all terms and conditions mentioned. :/

Because you keep adding links to a the same site and there is no proof that it's particularly reliable. ... discospinster _talk 00:56, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

The link I added was from a trusted source, cant you check the link once? Why in so much hurry? The link was appropriate and highly relevant to the article. Proof as well as quality can be checked by opening the link once. I have a master degree on this topic and reading about this technology from years. Anyways its your wish, by the way that link can be highly beneficial for your readers. But who cares, right?

I did check the link, and it is indeed a web page about the Internet of Things. But there are a lot of web pages about that, and the article is not meant to be a "link farm" or directory or repository of such web pages. The external links added are supposed to be reliable and authoritative, and add something specific to the article. See WP:ELNO, particularly #11. ... discospinster _talk 14:10, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

i actually dont know or i may have done it mistakely. sorry

Those edits were from last year so they were probably someone else using the IP address. ... discospinster _talk 18:30, 20 June 2015 (UTC)