User talk:Akash Mukherjee Edits

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Munir Khan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Munir Khan (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Oaktree b (talk) 15:20, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Bharat Katyayan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Giraffer ^{(talk·contribs)} 17:06, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Krishna Singh Thakur, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Bbb23 (talk) 17:37, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Akash Mukherjee Edits. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Baldev Batra, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. 2A00:23EE:2268:8F04:80BD:15FF:FE96:CEBE (talk) 07:32, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Krishna Singh Thakur and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 07:56, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Akash Mukherjee Edits! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 07:56, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Badal Barai requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 2A00:23EE:2268:8F04:80BD:15FF:FE96:CEBE (talk) 08:57, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Akash Mukherjee Edits. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Badal Barai, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Akash Mukherjee Edits. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Akash Mukherjee Edits|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 2A00:23EE:2268:8F04:80BD:15FF:FE96:CEBE (talk) 08:59, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Baldev Batra, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Akash Mukherjee Edits, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Akash Mukherjee Edits|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. 2A00:23EE:2268:8F04:80BD:15FF:FE96:CEBE (talk) 16:22, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok got it i didnt check the notification before sorry! Akash Mukherjee Edits (talk) 16:25, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir/Mam I not here for paid editing. I just seen that person on Television Show BigBoss so i thought. to create his page. So please guide me still i have to use that paid templete in my user account? Akash Mukherjee Edits (talk) 16:30, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You saw the health researcher Baldev Baltra on Bigg Boss? The fraudster Munir Khan? The lawyer Mahalakshmi Pavani? Is that really the best you can come up with? 2A00:23EE:2268:8F04:80BD:15FF:FE96:CEBE (talk) 16:33, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't explain this article, or this one or this one. All these are written in a VERY promotional manner. In some cases, the sources are blatantly fake. Mahalakshmi Pavani you used an article about Atlanta, Georgia in the US that has no mention of the subject. Many sources are clear press releases or paid articles. These same articles have been deleted on Simple as clearly promotional and you brought the same junk over here. Sorry, this explanation doesn't work. Ravensfire (talk) 17:10, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Akash Mukherjee Edits, these disclosures are required by the Terms of Use, they cannot be ignored under WP:IAR or any other policy. You can edit while being paid, but you must make the required declarations for each article. Either way, you are creating highly promotional articles with mostly junk sources. This is taking time from other editors to clean up. If this continues, this will probably need to go to WP:ANI and request admin review and intervention. Ravensfire (talk) 18:18, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning if you make any further edits without responding to the inquiry you received regarding undisclosed paid editing. Nearly every article you've created here has been deleted, is tagged for speedy deletion or is going through the RFD process with unanimous support for deletion. All of them have been incredibly promotional, many of the sources are clearly paid articles and more than a few sources are just random links you used that don't mention the subject or support the material! Any further articles along the same path and this will be taken to admins asking for you to be blocked. You are wasting a lot of time and good faith from a lot of people with the junk articles you are creating. Stop. Ravensfire (talk) 13:23, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To add, you've been blocked on commons for abusing multiple accounts. I've requested an SPI investigation on Simple for the same reasons. I haven't here because your obvious socks haven't edited here as well. Your most recent article was copied and pasted from IMDB which is a clear copyright violation. All of these things Wikipedia takes very seriously, you will end up blocked unless you come clean and stop breaking the rules. Ravensfire (talk) 13:37, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ryan P. Coyne, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:19, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Akash Mukherjee Edits

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ryan P. Coyne for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

RPSkokie (talk) 09:42, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Baldev Batra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baldev Batra until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Oaktree b (talk) 13:57, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Sasi Krishnasamy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 10:47, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Sasi Krishnasamy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 11:43, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 22:00, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mahalakshmi Pavani has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

COI editor, no notability in the article, lack of clear secondary coverage. Note: she may be the woman "senior advocate to the Legal Advisory Committee of the Bar Council of India"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chamaemelum (talk) 00:11, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Amansharma111 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Amansharma111. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 14:55, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]