User talk:14.139.219.242

Welcome! Last edited: Last edited by: 13:41, 15 May 2024 (UTC) MrOllie (talk · contribs) Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your IP address, 14.139.219.242, is registered to Tezpur University and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you. To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are unable to create an account due to your institution's IP address being blocked, follow these instructions. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your network administrator or instructor and request that your school contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using {{School block}}. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation. Educational institution staff and network administrators wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Older warnings and/or other comments on this page have been removed, but are still viewable in the page history.

Hello, I'm K6ka. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Pigment that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. K6ka (talk | contribs) 15:56, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm NicatronTg. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Theory of relativity, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Lucas "nicatronTg" Nicodemus (talk) 06:49, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Amber Rose Revah, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 10:27, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tezpur University may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• hostels/cmh/ Charaideo Men's Hostel]: Named after the burial land of Ahom kings in Sivasagar,Assam]].

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:25, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Assamese literature may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Contemporary writers include [[Arupa Patangia Kalita],Monikuntala Bhattacharya,Mousumi Kondoli, Monalisa Saikia.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:58, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Denisarona. An edit that you recently made to Manjul Bhargava seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Denisarona (talk) 12:33, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Flyer22. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Plant stem because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Flyer22 (talk) 08:53, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Environment Protection Act, 1986 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• under Article 253 of the Constitution. The purpose of the Act is to implement the decisions of the [[United Nations Conference on the Human Environment]s they relate to the protection and improvement

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:24, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Theatre of the Absurd may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• {lang-fr|Théâtre de l'Absurde}}) is a designation for particular [[Play (theatre)|plays]] of [[absurdist fiction]] written by a

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:05, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm George8211. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! George8211 / T 20:36, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Greedo8. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Anu Malik because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Greedo8 20:51, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jim1138. An edit that you recently made to Corruption in India seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Jim1138 (talk) 07:51, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Robotic paradigms. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. This is your last warning. --Serols (talk) 18:28, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. An edit that you recently made to String theory seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Materialscientist (talk) 23:04, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bertrand Traoré. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Qed237 (talk) 14:03, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jorhat Institute of Science & Technology, you may be blocked from editing. 2602:306:3357:BA0:296E:B120:F444:9E29 (talk) 16:31, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Mr. Smart LION. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Titabor— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠☎️✍⋡ 08:51, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Rasgulla, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:23, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Draft:ProGyan...the mindfest, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Sanyam.wikime (talk) 14:12, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 14.139.219.242. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Radhikaram Dhekial Phookan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:05, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Ingenuity. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Largest known prime number have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 16:12, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Twinkle1990 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to

• meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
• or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth
  

Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Add reliable per WP:RS secondary references. Primary sources are not enough for inclusion.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dhruba K. Bhattacharyya and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Twinkle1990 (talk) 06:53, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 14.139.219.242! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Twinkle1990 (talk) 06:53, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 14.139.219.242. We welcome your contributions, but it appears as if your primary purpose on Wikipedia is to add citations to sources you may be affiliated with.

Editing in this way is a violation of the policy against using Wikipedia for promotion and is a form of conflict of interest. The editing community considers excessive self-citing to be a form of spamming on Wikipedia (WP:REFSPAM); the edits will be reviewed and the citations removed where it was not appropriate to add them.

If you wish to continue contributing, please first consider citing other reliable secondary sources such as review articles that were written by other researchers in your field and that are already highly cited in the literature. If you wish to cite sources for which you may have a conflict of interest, please start a new section on the article's talk page and add {{Edit COI}} to ask a volunteer to review whether or not the citation should be added. MrOllie (talk) 13:41, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]