Talk:Surbiton High School

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Schools Low‑importance This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Reasoning for assessment: Not much here, no references, and WP:POV issues. Needs a lot of work Adam McCormick 01:41, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply] London Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Women's History Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Needs a serious rewrite - the whole article is a laughably-written and utterly fawning advert for the school --Cruci 15:55, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Over ten years later and it still reads as an advert. Mlleangelique (talk) 10:21, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This sort of thing is not acceptable under a policy of NPOV:

It has become infamous in recent years for the oppressive, vicious and commercial style of management, as well as for the overall distressed disposition of its staff owing to the recent change in management ethos, a change that has occasionally been likened to certain dubious historical governments. It has certainly strayed a considerable way from any Christian principles it once held. MRSC 06:57, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that's true. Surbiton is a thriving school that is doing far better that the other schools in the area. As for the style of management, it is neither oppressive, vicious or commercial. The staff AND pupil atmosphere is very friendly and supportive and it is a very welcoming environment.The school is friendly and gives everyone all the values they need as young children and the beginning of adult.I truly recommend this amazing school which gets the best out of everyone. As for the Christian principles it "once held", you may want to bear in mind that Religious Studies is still compulsory up to GCSE, moreover, there is assembly most days for the lower school whereby girls are taught By all sorts of charities and stuffLinecony! (talk) 07:56, 19 May 2020 (UTC). Even the sixth form are not exempt from some of these assemblies. In addition to this there are communion services, rooms for thinking and quiet prayer, carol concerts in the church, regular visits from the local clergymen etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.153.14.187 (talk) 13:02, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Surbiton High School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070714213013/http://www.ucstrust.org.uk/content.asp?id=199&area=1 to http://www.ucstrust.org.uk/content.asp?id=199&area=1
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.surbito/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081020062128/http://www.goodschoolsguide.co.uk/school/surbiton-high-school.html to http://goodschoolsguide.co.uk/school/surbiton-high-school.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:18, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]