Talk:Royal Albanian Gendarmerie
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Royal Albanian Gendarmerie article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Albania may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Requested move
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved. DrKiernan (talk) 19:58, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
Royal Albanian Gendarmery → Royal Albanian Gendarmerie – "Royal Albanian Gendarmerie" exists, and redirects to Royal Albanian Army. Mr.Lenntl recently created a fairly decent article on the Gendarmerie on this page instead. I'd nominate for a technical move, but I imagine someone might contend the entire article should be merged with the Army article. —Ignatzmicetalkcontribs 01:27, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
- Support A technical move would've been fine; merging is a separate matter, even if it does come up in RM from time to time. This is a classic spinoff article, and it should be at the more logical title you've proposed, with a {{main}} tagging the section in the larger article. --BDD (talk) 16:55, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Sources and cleanup needed
Dear editor(s), there is no mention of sources used to create this article (even less citations); and the tone of the article looks more a personal essay than an encyclopedic article. This has been tagged in the article. It also and needs a better structure (i.e.: sections) to display information, and a few pictures to illustrate the subject. Can anyone please help? Thanks & regards, DPdH (talk) 00:26, 19 January 2014 (UTC)