This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related articles
Well, the other page is a copyvio anyway, so... --Shuki (talk) 10:20, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
In that case, I would suggest at least making a concerted effort to make a clear distinction between Nahal Haredi and the various Battalions.--הרב המקובל אלכהן (talk) 18:12, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I deleted Nahal Charedi as a copyright violation, so you can make the new page as you like it. I created a redirect here in the interim. Thanks. KrakatoaKatie 13:18, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Allagations of Human rights abuses
There are enough sources claiming that this battalion has commited human rights abuses against Palestinians to justify a new section on this topic.Pngeditor (talk) 14:42, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This page has been updated to include US State Department plans to sanction the battalion, but given this has not yet occurred, isn't it vastly premature to be reporting on this? I'm recommending reversion until or unless this actually happens!
If it is retained, then it's probably fair to add the accusations of anti-Semitism and how even Israel's Opposition reject the move. 203.33.160.4 (talk) 203.33.160.4 (talk) 05:54, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Update
I updated the article including the response by current Israel PM Netanyahu.
It is absurd not to include some information about the hilltop youth who are make up part of the Unit (and hence one of the main reasons, even indirectly of why the Unit was sanctioned by the United States). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.47.192.252 (talk) 10:53, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]