Talk:Liberalism in the United States

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Liberalism in the United States article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7Auto-archiving period: 365 days

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Politics: American Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as High-importance). Philosophy: Social and political Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Social and political philosophy

To-do list for Liberalism in the United States: edit · history · watch · refresh · Updated 2013-07-28 Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Expand : "A Liberal Definition" by John F. Kennedy (acceptance speech of the New York Liberal Party nomination, September 14, 1960 [1] * Add on Progressive Party (United States, 1948) Priority 2

After reading that under social liberalism, "the common good [is] considered as compatible with or superior to the freedom of the individual", I found myself wondering why capital punishment, which is justified by considering the common good superior to the freedom of the individual being thus punished, is conservative rather than liberal. Some goal or value is missing from the delineation, because none of the ones given would lead one to oppose rather than support capital punishment. Philgoetz (talk) 02:50, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Capital punishment is punishment. There is no evidence that it prevents crime. Capital punishment is favored by those who want to hurt people they consider bad. Rick Norwood (talk) 09:49, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"There is no evidence that it prevents crime." As far as I know, it never did. As with any other laws with the explicit intention to intimidate. There are several centuries of data about its ineffectiveness. Dimadick (talk) 10:16, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There's something fundamentally wrong here: The article strives to discriminate American liberalism from European liberalism, but attributes belief in "the common good" to American liberalism. "The common good" however, comes from Rousseau, made the difference between the American and French Revolutions, and has always been diagnostic of European thought. The liberalism in America, by the time of the Revolution, was based on a different conception of "the common good" than European liberalism. American liberals have until quite recently believed that, at the policy level, there is no such thing as a "common good". They believed that even good people have conflicting interests, and the purpose of government is to referee the development of a compromise between competing interests. So by identifying the "common good" with American liberalism, this article in effect says that American liberalism has been supplanted by European liberalism. Philgoetz (talk) 03:08, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There are a number of strange statements above, particularly the idea that "American liberals have until quite recently believed that, at the policy level, there is no such thing as a "common good"." Jefferson changed Locke's "property" to "the pursuit of happiness", certainly happiness is a common good. The preamble to the constitution gives one reason for government to "promote the general welfare", certainly a common good. The big difference between European use of the word liberalism and the American use has to do with economic freedom in the European usage with some limitations on the concentration and power of wealth in the American usage. Rick Norwood (talk) 09:55, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]