Talk:Advanced technology engine

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Engineering Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Aviation This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: | b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> | b2<!--Coverage and accuracy   --> = <yes/no> | b3<!--Structure               --> = <yes/no> | b4<!--Grammar and style       --> = <yes/no> | b5<!--Supporting materials    --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

I was surprised to see this article since I didn't recall hearing the term previously. A quick google search "advanced technology engine" didn't find much, just things like this 1979 conference proceeding, 1986 DoD acquisition study, and a 2014 NASA study of engine design for a specific tiltrotor project. I'm not sure that this term is in wide-enough use to justify this article, though that might just reflect my ignorance. Krb19 (talk) 14:41, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These two articles cover much the same subject, although contents are currently quite distinct. Better to have one with everything. Lfstevens (talk) 23:44, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]