User contributions for 2604:3D09:8880:11E0:0:0:0:7044
For 2604:3D09:8880:11E0:0:0:0:7044 talk block log logs filter log
6 June 2024
- 18:1618:16, 6 June 2024 diff hist −178 Alison Lawton →Philanthropy and advocacy: link no longer effective Tag: Reverted
5 June 2024
- 21:4321:43, 5 June 2024 diff hist +327 Talk:Athabasca River →map fault: new section current Tag: New topic
31 May 2024
- 19:4019:40, 31 May 2024 diff hist −38 Timeline of labour issues and events in Canada →1940s: combined two entries current
- 19:3919:39, 31 May 2024 diff hist +587 Timeline of labour issues and events in Canada →1940s: added entry
29 May 2024
- 20:4920:49, 29 May 2024 diff hist +347 Proportional representation →Advantages and disadvantages: added info Tag: Reverted
- 20:3720:37, 29 May 2024 diff hist +43 Proportional representation →Advantages and disadvantages Tag: Reverted
- 20:3620:36, 29 May 2024 diff hist +458 Proportional representation →How the single transferable vote (STV) works: the DM-3 is inhibiting of proportionality. A larger DM is possible under STV and would be more proportional Tag: Reverted
- 20:3020:30, 29 May 2024 diff hist +372 Proportional representation →How the single transferable vote (STV) works: overcoming problem of STV example having just two parties while other examples have four Tag: Reverted
- 20:2320:23, 29 May 2024 diff hist +8 Proportional representation →Differences from mixed-member majoritarian system: total number of seas is the same 200 Tag: Reverted
- 20:2020:20, 29 May 2024 diff hist +113 Proportional representation →Differences from parallel voting Tag: Reverted
- 20:1920:19, 29 May 2024 diff hist +82 Mixed-member majoritarian representation MMM is a form of parallel voting, not all parallel voting is MMM
- 20:1320:13, 29 May 2024 diff hist +100 Mixed-member majoritarian representation first past the post is plurality based not majoritarian
24 May 2024
- 21:0721:07, 24 May 2024 diff hist −8 Single non-transferable vote →Comparison to MNTV (Block voting) and Limited Voting: 100% means nothing when votes cast multiple votes current
17 May 2024
- 21:5521:55, 17 May 2024 diff hist +95 Single transferable vote →Process: clarification
- 21:5121:51, 17 May 2024 diff hist −10 Single transferable vote clarification
- 21:2021:20, 17 May 2024 diff hist +38 Single transferable vote clarification
- 21:1821:18, 17 May 2024 diff hist +116 Wasted vote →Thresholds and lost votes: clarification
- 21:0321:03, 17 May 2024 diff hist +287 Talk:Droop quota →This article is wrong and self-contradictory: added another thing
- 20:5620:56, 17 May 2024 diff hist +7,166 Talk:Droop quota →This article is wrong and self-contradictory: new section Tag: New topic
- 20:1920:19, 17 May 2024 diff hist +77 Wasted vote →Ranked voting Tag: Reverted
- 20:1620:16, 17 May 2024 diff hist +20 Wasted vote →Ranked voting: added PR to the sentence
- 20:0420:04, 17 May 2024 diff hist +1,443 Talk:Majoritarian representation →FPTP is not majoritarian: new section current Tag: New topic
- 20:0220:02, 17 May 2024 diff hist +1,236 Talk:Majoritarian representation →Majoritarian representation vs. majoritarian-at-large vs majority rule: added response to "talk" section on how FPTP is not majoritarian
16 May 2024
- 21:2221:22, 16 May 2024 diff hist +439 Canadian Labour Revolt 1919 Vancouver general strike not even hinted at before in this article. hopefully i have opened door to others to contribute on the 1919 Vanc. strike current
- 20:2420:24, 16 May 2024 diff hist +14 Timeline of labour issues and events in Canada →1890s: RP was just young guy in 1898
- 19:4919:49, 16 May 2024 diff hist +1,010 User talk:Joeyconnick →Droop quota: new section Tag: New topic
- 19:3819:38, 16 May 2024 diff hist +184 Single transferable vote →Use: clarification but leaving unsaid my previous comment on Block voting.
- 19:3119:31, 16 May 2024 diff hist +75 Single transferable vote Undid revision 1223673256 by Closed Limelike Curves (talk) STV is sometimes called PRCV. it is a fact. Tag: Undo
- 19:2319:23, 16 May 2024 diff hist +470 Droop quota the exact words of Henry Droop should be a part of the Droop quota article. Dancisin "Misrepresentation of the H-B quota" is worth mentioning as the wiki article as it currently stands is an example of misrepresentation. Tag: Reverted
- 19:1819:18, 16 May 2024 diff hist +65 Talk:Droop quota →recent edits: fixed citation
- 19:1619:16, 16 May 2024 diff hist +304 Droop quota added info Tag: Reverted
- 18:5118:51, 16 May 2024 diff hist 0 Talk:Droop quota →recent edits
- 18:4918:49, 16 May 2024 diff hist +84 Talk:Droop quota →recent edits: added citation info to my entry in talk
15 May 2024
- 22:3222:32, 15 May 2024 diff hist +135 Comparison of the Hare and Droop quotas →Scenario 3: clarification
- 22:2722:27, 15 May 2024 diff hist +352 Comparison of the Hare and Droop quotas →General comparison
- 22:1922:19, 15 May 2024 diff hist +36 Comparison of the Hare and Droop quotas →Scenario 3
- 22:1522:15, 15 May 2024 diff hist +421 Comparison of the Hare and Droop quotas →Scenario 3: previous version was wrong (if numbers provided are correct) -- Greens not take two seats under largest remainder system.
- 21:2821:28, 15 May 2024 diff hist +35 Comparison of the Hare and Droop quotas →Scenario 3: explanation
- 21:1321:13, 15 May 2024 diff hist +517 Comparison of the Hare and Droop quotas →Scenario 1: added explanation
- 20:5020:50, 15 May 2024 diff hist −49 Comparison of the Hare and Droop quotas →General comparison: under both Droop and Hare, a group of voters elect a member and that member represents the group.
- 20:3220:32, 15 May 2024 diff hist +13 Droop quota →Standard Formula: if more than 50 percent is enough to be elected in single-winner election, as we say, then formula should say this. Tag: Reverted
- 20:2320:23, 15 May 2024 diff hist −5 Droop quota "full seat" is un-necessary a seat can never be a fraction Tag: Reverted
- 20:1620:16, 15 May 2024 diff hist +8 Talk:Droop quota →recent edits
- 20:1520:15, 15 May 2024 diff hist +481 Talk:Droop quota →recent edits: Reply Tag: Reply
- 20:1220:12, 15 May 2024 diff hist +868 Talk:Droop quota →recent edits: added info explaining my position that Droop/H-B is greater than votes/seats plus 1.
7 May 2024
- 15:1815:18, 7 May 2024 diff hist −10 2008 New Brunswick electoral reform referendum No edit summary current
3 May 2024
- 19:0119:01, 3 May 2024 diff hist +13 Droop quota →Standard Formula: droop is set at more than votes/seas plus 1 Tag: Reverted
- 18:4418:44, 3 May 2024 diff hist +19 Droop quota →Standard Formula Tag: Reverted
- 18:4218:42, 3 May 2024 diff hist +195 Droop quota I put in citation for the info Tag: Reverted
- 18:3618:36, 3 May 2024 diff hist +135 Droop quota droop quota can be fraction but often it is rounded off to next highest full number Tag: Reverted