User contributions for 2601:246:C700:558:4934:BD1D:2B41:D139

24 January 2022

• 00:4700:47, 24 January 2022 diff hist +3‎ User talk:Smallbones ‎ →‎Request of you as a registered user
• 00:4600:46, 24 January 2022 diff hist +27‎ User talk:Smallbones ‎ →‎Request of you as a registered user

23 January 2022

• 23:5423:54, 23 January 2022 diff hist +1,420‎ User talk:Smallbones ‎ →‎Request of you as a registered user: new section
• 22:2022:20, 23 January 2022 diff hist +1,355‎ User talk:John M Wolfson ‎ →‎Notification of administrators without tools
• 21:5521:55, 23 January 2022 diff hist +1,246‎ User talk:Graham87 ‎ →‎TY and FYI: new section
• 21:4421:44, 23 January 2022 diff hist +1,620‎ First Wikipedia edit ‎ Top 8 citations text/format-checked. SEE <!-- re: TwoOneTwo. Demoted <ref name="gizmo"> supporting "on January 15… [WP] was launched" because source only says "first rolled out… mid-January…". Promoted <ref name="busin"> because citation actually says 15th (see quotes each citation). BUT, even "busin" deserves {{better citation}}. NOTE, because article will draw attention, we ought make it a near picture-perfect WP:GA example. I have no subject matter expertise, can only check sources, formats.
• 20:2520:25, 23 January 2022 diff hist +901‎ User talk:Doc James ‎ →‎PM International
• 20:0520:05, 23 January 2022 diff hist +745‎ User talk:55eo55 ‎ →‎Hello colleague
• 20:0020:00, 23 January 2022 diff hist +19‎ Taylor Russell ‎ Meant to say great job User:55eo55, adding sources to reimprov Career sect. Things done now—[A] moved full, new place-of-birth citation from infobox to main body (minor, markup tidiness); [B] returned phrase "identifies as mixed race." Re: phrase, here's why: (i) is from that source; (ii) is used repeatedly there; (iii) source is Byron Allen Afr-Amer publication—so sufficiently sensitive; (iv) comment sets up next colorism statement; (v) earlier out-then-in edits say "in" is consensus.
• 19:3819:38, 23 January 2022 diff hist −50‎ Taylor Russell ‎ →‎Career: Job probably is not quite done—the earlier mis-attributions of content to sources suggests all content needs to be checked against the earlier appearing sources—but enough progress has been made in section, so that section tag cen be removed. As I check sentences against paragraph end citations, any sentences or parts not covered can be identified by inline tags instead.