User contributions for 17enk4900

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

21:4121:41, 20 May 2024 diff hist +15‎ m William Atherton ‎ As the right side bar states and he has talked about publicly, he was born William Atherton Knight. There is no Scott. He dropped Knight because the Screen Actors Guild already had a Bill Knight registered. Every book with film data shows William Athertonm, born William Atherton Knight. Tags: Undo Reverted

20:0020:00, 2 September 2023 diff hist −44‎ m William Atherton ‎ We'll leave this introduction but with several small edits for accuracy. An opinion about roles & part sizes is simply not agreed to by critics or the public and is now falling under Wikipedia's "contentious material" definition and by that rule, has been removed. Let's agree to leave this intro with minor edits removing opinion and leaving facts only. There also was no 'blacklisting.' Atherton has worked regularly in TV & film for many years.

16:5716:57, 1 September 2023 diff hist −356‎ William Atherton ‎ Not only is BPB correct that those roles were not cameos, the editor is incorrect--Sugarland Express was a starring role, the male lead opposite Goldie Hawn as just one example. Opinions are not facts. Original text of what Atherton is most known for is correct and Yours6700 has a striking negative,inaccurate personal opinion. Main films are listed in subsequent paragraphs where they belong.

01:0801:08, 7 August 2023 diff hist −335‎ m William Atherton ‎ Reverting to original more accurate summation text. Removed copy reflects editor's personal (and negative) opinion, rather than anything factual. He did not have only one leading role; his characters were not "minor" (or "nothing" as he explains in his comment) by any accredited critic and is also redundant, listing the same films in the next paragraphs.

23:5123:51, 27 July 2021 diff hist +1,575‎ m User talk:PBP ‎ Response to the editor on his comment

21:5921:59, 23 July 2021 diff hist +6,660‎ m User talk:PBP ‎ Deleted incorrect edit and explained why those changes were made.
21:2921:29, 23 July 2021 diff hist −818‎ m William Atherton ‎ Deleted incorrect information and poor sources as other editors have done previously. Fuller explanation on talk page for the editor PBP